2012 May 23 |
 |
http://www.theatlanticright.com/2010/06/23/gen-mcchrystal-president-obama-ambassador-eikenberry-and-the-ugly-political-war-in-afghanistan-2/
0
0

This post first appeared at NewsReal.

Michael Yon - a journalist with a lot of contacts in the army, and who has, among others, been embedded in Afghanistan and Iraq – has written a lot about the deteriorating situation in Afghanistan on his FaceBook page. He believes that both the military and civilian leaderships have failed in this war, and that McChrystal’s interview with Rolling Stone and the successive battle in the press are actually part of a political dog fight.

When asked who is responsible for what he calls “the mess” in Afghanistan, Yon replied: “Obama is part of the problem. McChrystal is part of the problem. Some say that Eikenberry is part of the problem but that’s getting out of my lane. Clearly this war is beyond ‘messed up.’ It’s schoolyard political while a serious war is blowing up.”

“It’s a political swamp,” he continued.

The situation in Afghanistan and the obvious lack of trust between the Obama administration on the one hand, and the military leadership (most importantly Gen. McChrystal himself) could lead to disaster. ” [I] have been saying since April 2006 that Afghanistan has [the] potential to overshadow anything we ever saw in Iraq,” Yon said. “Today, I stand by that stronger than ever.”

When I just heard the news that Gen. McChrystal had been summoned to the White House, I shared it with Yon on Twitter, who immediately answered that “McChrystal should be fired.” Although I was initially inclined to disagree – or to at least see things in a somewhat more nuanced light – I changed my mind when, moments later, Time published the actual Rolling Stone article. It is even worse than expected. Even if you believe that McChrystal’s criticism is to a large degree justified, he should have kept his mouth shut. A general has no business badmouthing his (civilian) superiors, especially not in front of a journalist. It is that simple. As Yon says on FaceBook page, “unless McChrystal basically denies the article, he must be fired. If he is not fired, I will start calling him President McChrystal because Obama clearly is not in charge.”

Having said that, although I understand the anger directed at the general, I don’t believe that firing him will make much of a difference in the grand scheme of things. This is bigger than one general. From reading Yon’s updates about the war, it’s clear to me that both the military leadership and the civilian leadership are deeply divided. As if that’s not bad enough, they also seem too busy fighting each other to even think about permanently defeating the Taliban.

In other words, calling the situation in Afghanistan precarious would be quite an understatement, and pretending that if we just rid ourselves of the general all will be fine isn’t very convincing. Not to me, anyway.

Again, Gen. McChrystal has to be held to account for this incendiary article. There’s no way around it. But expect no miracles with regards to the state of the war in Afghanstan. If things are as bad as Yon says they are, it requires more than McChrystal’s resignation to clean up the mess, including a drastic change in Washington’s Afghanistan policy.

  1. Posted by AnonymousCoward
    | Quote | Trackback | Link #111575
    AnonymousCoward I doubt that, behind the scenes, the real reason for sacking him was because he did not suck up to his civilian bosses. I understand they need to make a scene about that to appease the likes of Jesse Jackson. However, the article showed a lack of belief in the abilities of Karzai and the US strategy. That alone is damaging (highly damaging) to this war. Karzai needs credibility as he strives to balance: -The Afghan Government, -The US, -The Pakistanis, -The Indians and Russians, -The Iranians, -The Taliban (should have been first) This is the point where he needs credibility the most. This is also the point the US needs to appear unified, with unflinching resolve. Esp. since the Taliban are just biding their time until the withdrawal before they start with what they do best. I am not, nor have any aspirations to be, the prez. However, I do think the real reason Obama had a talk with the general before sacking him was to see if he would withdraw his comments to change the PR situation, or consent to a lengthy press release. This is supposition on my part, but I have distaste for the idea that a commander in so critical a position could be sacked before he did not bow down before the high and mighty politicians.
  2. Pingback | Link #111603
    Obama Is Furious at General McChrystal [...] Merritt – Not Surprised by McChrystal Rolling Stone Comments Michael van der Galien – Gen. McChrystal, President Obama, Ambassador Eikenberry and the Ugly Political War in Afghanistan Michael Merritt – Petreaus Right for the Job Share and [...]