2012 May 23 |
 |
http://www.theatlanticright.com/2010/05/22/thoughts-on-rand-paul/
0
7

I believe that it’s unfair to pretend that Rand Paul is a racist. When he committed the now infamous Civil Rights Act gaffe, I’m sure he didn’t mean to imply that he believes that African Americans are inferior and that segregation was mighty fine system.

No, this isn’t about racism – I don’t believe Paul to be a racist – but about libertarianism. Rand is quite doctrinaire. He believes in a literal interpretation of the constitution and, therefore, the tenth amendment.

Quite a lot of laws – even morally good ones – are, many libertarians believe, in breach with this amendment and therefore unconstitutional. Note that this does not mean that these libertarians oppose the ideas behind such laws. The opposite is likely to be true in many case: more often than not, libertarians are fervently anti-racism.

Of course this does not mean that Rand has made no mistakes. He has just one person to thank for this controversy: himself.

Rand has proved himself to be an amateur. He’s not ready for the spotlight. And that alone is reason enough to highly critical of him. But let’s not pretend that libertarianism equals racism.

  1. Michael_Merritt He said he would have voted for it. He should make that point clear, but explain his objections to the provisions, and why he objects to them.
  2. Posted by Lee Thomas
    | Quote | Trackback | Link #111139
    Lee Thomas Mr. Paul will have a very hard time convincing the population of Ky. to vote for him come November. He is a libertarian and by and large most libertarians have views that are just hard to swallow. One website that I have visited the owner claims that it should be the persons right to....."Drive 100mph thru a school zone, drinking whiskey and snorting cocaine while firing his assault gun out the window" As long as no one gets hurt. If someone gets hurt then they are of course subject to being hung. Additionally they believe its everyones right to have multiple wives.....etc...etc. The problem with Mr. Paul is that his father has a small district to try and influence with his libertarian views and he succeeds and gets elected. Mr. Paul has an entire state to try and convince and I think its going to be much harder, especially since the left sees an opportunity to go after Rand Paul much as the right is going after Nancy Pelosi and more to the point. Harry Reid. Both sides use Rovian or Alinsky tactics and right now Rand Paul is going to suffer a barage of attacks from all across the nation as the left tries to discredit the entire right, the tea party movement and to paint all Conservatives on the right as Rand Paul clones. Thats politics. The GOP has Rand Paul in their roost now. They are going to need to get together with this guy and make some changes to his message or else the entire GOP could go down the tubes over Rand Paul cause lets face it. Libertarianism is fringe. At least to current America and while I agree with many of its tenets it requires scholars to understand where they are coming from. In a world of sound bites, Libertarianism is doomed to get the short end of the stick.
    • Michael_Merritt
      One website that I have visited the owner claims that it should be the persons right to....."Drive 100mph thru a school zone, drinking whiskey and snorting cocaine while firing his assault gun out the window" As long as no one gets hurt. If someone gets hurt then they are of course subject to being hung.
      Then the poster of that message is not really a libertarian. Even the hardcore guys won't argue that you can drive recklessly through an area where the danger of hurting somebody is so high.
      Additionally they believe its everyones right to have multiple wives.....etc...etc.
      While there is a legitimate argument to be made for allowing polygamy (that is consensual), again you make blanket statements. The social views of libertarianism are as widespread as any other ideology. Look at Ron Paul. The most prominent libertarian (before Rand, anyway), but also very religious. He opposes abortion, for instance. I think you'll find that most libertarians practice monogamy.
      Mr. Paul has an entire state to try and convince and I think its going to be much harder
      Now that's true. For the most part, Senators are typically much more moderate than their House counterparts. That's because they must represent their whole state instead of just a small portion.
  3. Posted by Lee Thomas
    | Quote | Trackback | Link #111148
    Lee Thomas As a conservative I can make my case in sound bytes. Lower taxes. Smaller government. Strong borders. Strong national defense. Pro life. Religious freedom. Sound byte populism. In a world of sound bytes there just is not enough time to put forth your argument if you are a libertarian. I am not trashing Libertarians. I am playing the devils advocate and pointing out what has always been their weakness. That weakness is that they cannot put their beliefs into sound byte populism and have it make sense. It takes efforts to understand people like Rand Paul or Ron Paul. You have to understand their basic concept of the 10th amendment and an extremely limited view of the feds ability to take over every aspect of our lives. The point that the Gun Toting Liberal who claims to be a libertarian and who affirmed his believes in what I posted above is that it should not be the federal governments duty to tell us what we can and cannot do if what we are doing does not affect anyone else. When I objected to me he points out that their are many different types of libertarians and that he happens to be a Liberal big L and libertarian small l. Whatever that means. Once again I have to spend hours of debate trying to understand what it is he is trying to say whenever he starts espousing his version of libertarianism. In the months of discussions with him I have grown to understand just as there are many different philosophies within the Conservative or Liberal movements, so to are there just as many differing views within the libertarian community.
    • Michael_Merritt The problem is that ideologies don't generally make platforms, parties do. And the Libertarian Party has a platform of limited government both economically and socially, as well as drawing back on the world platform. Their issue is not one of not being able to explain themselves in an easy to understand manner. It's one of promotion. A couple of the politicians running for positions in my state had massive campaigns before the state conventions last weekend. If the LP did something like that, I think people would take notice. You call yourself a conservative, but you must understand that "conservative" can mean different things to different people, as does "liberal." So, making your case in terms of ideology is really only making your case. If you want to make a case that would appeal to a wide audience, create a political party and have a brand for your views.
      • Posted by Lee Thomas
        | Quote | Trackback | Link #111304
        Lee Thomas Mr. Rand Paul ran as a Republican even though he is a libertarian. That makes for some awfully confused voters right now. The democrats are going to try and pin the libertarian platform on the GOP now for the next 5 months.
  4. Posted by Jeb
    | Quote | Trackback | Link #111247
    Jeb Paul and other libertarians argue that market forces would have ended segregation and other inequities that the CRA addressed. The problem with the libertarian argument here is that it ignores the reality of the time. Market forces could possibly have impacted large companies operating in the South due to pressure from outside the region. That would have meant though that those companies would not have been able to do business in the South. The vast majority of white customers would have ceased to be customers and in many cases there would be mobs with axe handles to enforce what the law would not and the police would have done nothing to stop it.
  5. Posted by Interested
    | Quote | Trackback | Link #111277
    Interested whew, forgive me if there are several posts - I was laughing so hard after jeb's comments. jeb - do you not see the obvious ignorant view of reality that you just mentioned?