2012 May 23 |
 |
http://www.theatlanticright.com/2010/04/29/my-kind-of-atheist-the-triumphant-comeback/
0
0
  |   17 comments

I really need to do these posts more.  The last was over a year ago.  Anyway, my post this time features an interview Sean Hannity had last night with S.E. Cupp, the conservative author of “Losing Our Religion,” a newly-released book that chronicles the (liberal) media’s attack on Christianity, and in particular, conservative Christians.

Best part?  She’s an atheist!  Needless to say, I think I know my next book after I finish Liberal Fascism.

If there is something the world needs more of, it is more rational atheists speaking out against the militants.  To say that they don’t speak for the rest of us with their ridicule of Christians.  I am thinking of starting a project to accomplish just that goal.  If anyone reading considers themselves a rational atheist, whether you’re a liberal or a conservative, and you’re interested in joining together to call out the militants, let me know.

  1. Posted by Evil
    | Quote | Trackback | Link #110684
    Evil There are no militant atheists. Hezbollah are militants. No. I hate religion, and always will. I hate religion and I hate those who do not hate it. It is disgusting to want to change *our shared* society based on mental concepts that you can never convince another person of. I have to defend my positions and policy propositions by referring to the real world, but religious people apparently are above such accountability. Repeat after me - the only reason you believe in anything is because your family and community put it inside you when you were a child. Religious faith is not a choice, an on-off switch. It is a resoldering of the limbic system.
    • Michael_Merritt
      I hate those who do not hate it.
      Apparently, you have a lot of hate in you. I think of it this way: I do not believe, and do not wish to do so (though religion as academic subject fascinates me), but I'm open minded. At the same time, I cannot hate or dislike those that do. Everybody has something that works for them. Atheism (or what I call "practical atheism") works for me. I know people who are pretty devout, and guess what: it works for them! I guess it's a "whatever floats your boat" matter for me.
      It is disgusting to want to change *our shared* society based on mental concepts that you can never convince another person of.
      Ironically, many atheists would like to do just this. And actually, I don't have a problem with that, given that it's done through proper discourse and not the kind of stuff we get from Hitchens, Dawkins, and the like. As you say, it can be a tricky matter to convince someone of other beliefs. But it's not impossible. By the way, that works the other way around, too. Someone might be convinced to start believing in a deity.
      but religious people apparently are above such accountability.
      It is admittedly easier for them, since being religious has a majority. I think there will come a time where those institutions will need to defend their claim, lest they go the way of the mammoth.
      • Posted by Evil
        | Quote | Trackback | Link #110723
        Evil "Ironically, many atheists would like to do just this. And actually, I don't have a problem with that, given that it's done through proper discourse and not the kind of stuff we get from Hitchens, Dawkins, and the like." No. If they wanted that they would be religious. This is one of the reasons I am so angry all the time - I get this false equivalence pedantry thrown at me whenever I open my mouth. There is nothing "ironic", here. Stop trying to be clever. Hitchens and Dawkins, like me, want us to build society based on what we can possibly ascertain. Their arguments are at least compatible with academic and judicial standards of truth and credibility. Religious arguments for how we should build society or act are by default null.
  2. Posted by Evil
    | Quote | Trackback | Link #110685
    Evil Pt.2 When religious people refer to their theologies, they are basically pointing at an eternally closed shed without windows or doors that can definitionally never be breached, and then they say there is an entity living in there that wants us to make gay people miserable/have these kinds of social policies/treat girls this way/follow these virtues etc. That is *disgusting*. By *definition* nothing a religious person believes can *ever* be proven. Yet you dare to subject society to your faith. Yet you *dare* to want courtesy from people like me. You dare to complain about "militants" (lol, pathetic) and rudeness. Try coming out as gay in a religious village in white trash America. Try having an entire high school bullying you because you wanted to take a person of the wrong gender to the prom, with the school board (grown adults) even tries to turn other students against you.
    • Michael_Merritt
      When religious people refer to their theologies, they are basically pointing at an eternally closed shed without windows or doors that can definitionally never be breached, and then they say there is an entity living in there that wants us to make gay people miserable/have these kinds of social policies/treat girls this way/follow these virtues etc. That is *disgusting*.
      It's a different way of trying to explain the universe. Many of religion's explanations have been thoroughly debunked by now, but there are still some things that no human can explain very well. Though, with time, they will probably be able to. Oh, and no need to paint all religious people with the same brush. You seem to think all of them are fundamentalists, but that's not true.
      By *definition* nothing a religious person believes can *ever* be proven. Yet you dare to subject society to your faith. Yet you *dare* to want courtesy from people like me. You dare to complain about "militants" (lol, pathetic) and rudeness. Try coming out as gay in a religious village in white trash America. Try having an entire high school bullying you because you wanted to take a person of the wrong gender to the prom, with the school board (grown adults) even tries to turn other students against you.
      You ought to find another method of debate besides ranting. I don't know if your "you"s are directed toward me or in general, but I am an atheist. I just want atheists to be part of civil discourse. And most are, but there are a contingent that would rather make fun of and ridicule religion and its adherents rather than give well reasoned arguments as to why it's the wrong way to view the universe. By the way, I consider the same true of the believers. They must also be part of civil discourse, and not ridicule atheists for their lack of belief.
      • Posted by Evil
        | Quote | Trackback | Link #110724
        Evil "Oh, and no need to paint all religious people with the same brush. You seem to think all of them are fundamentalists, but that's not true. " Most of them are, seeing as most of them are arrogant enough to bring their personal faith outside of their skulls, where it *belongs*.
  3. Posted by Evil
    | Quote | Trackback | Link #110686
    Evil Oh and one more thing - "rational atheist", eh? Yeah, as if there is any other kind. Lol.
  4. Posted by Brian
    | Quote | Trackback | Link #110692
    Brian People who aren't religious have different opinions on sexuality, its not a religious thing. And no religion teaches people to bully or act cruel to people. So what the f*ck are you talking about?
  5. Posted by Evil
    | Quote | Trackback | Link #110691
    Evil My view is that if you want to call yourself a Christian, then you have to accept that homophobes and non-secular people (or creationists, society's clowns) will make your faith look worse and make people very adverse and not very soft in their tone. In this case you have some choices: Either actively point to non-secularists and such maniacs and just declare them "non-Christians", break apart and say you have your own and secular faith or just clam up. Don't get all up in my face and complain about rude atheists like Maher or Dawkins. After all, you are a man and an individual. I don't see myself as an "atheist", I don't think I am part of some minority or denomination. If I ever stopped thinking like an individual and started thinking and making decisions based on some minority perspective, I would become intellectually and spiritually null, like Sharpton or the kind of people who think putting black characters in shows make things more "equal" (or the kind of conservatives who blubber about the "liberal media" - people like that never amount to anything). So, basically, if someone attacks your faith then I really really don't think you have a reason to complain about it. If someone said you were a bad person because you were religious then you could complain. But seriously, when people like me or Dawkins rub you the wrong way, we are not actively trying to get you steamed (unless you are a homophobe or creationist - we love to make people like that miserable) - we are just describing what religion is right on the tin and describing what religion does to society.
  6. Posted by Brian
    | Quote | Trackback | Link #110693
    Brian People who aren't religious have different opinions on sexuality, its not a religious thing. And no religion teaches people to bully or act cruel to people. So what the f*ck are you talking about?
  7. Posted by Brian
    | Quote | Trackback | Link #110697
    Brian Part of the problem is that there are very few people who are actually homophobes or creationists, they're marginal figures in society, and have almost no power. The Westoboro Baptist church is a circus side show and everybody hates them and speaks out against them. The people who made the Creation Museum are a circus sideshow and everybody laughs at them. Do these people really need to be denounced? Really? Not any more than groups like ELF need to be denounced by anyone who supports environmentalism. Maher has a TV show and Dawkins was a professor. These people wanting to represent Christians by the Westboro Baptist Church is like representing environmentalism by ELF.
  8. Posted by Brian
    | Quote | Trackback | Link #110709
    Brian Being religious doesn't have a majority, though, really. Church attendance is extremely low; most people only attend on holidays for social purposes. Very few people believe in abstinence, and in fact not having sex is seen by most people as repressive. So people are asked in a poll, if they're a Christian or if they believe in God, and they say yes. But what does that really mean? I think the political debate over this really distorts the issue, and makes it seem like religion controls the sentiments of the country, when it really really doesn't.
    • Michael_Merritt Depends on where you're getting your stats, I guess. One study says it's pretty steady since the 1970s, between 23 and 28 services a year. Also, being religious does not necessarily mean you're socially conservative. Look at the Episcopalians, Anglicans, and even the Catholics in some cases. Nor does it mean you're particularly devout. Perhaps I should have not mixed "religious" and "believer" in my comment, as atheism is the lack of belief in any kind of deity (including non-Christian ones), but believer can mean you're a Christian, Muslim, Jew, deist, pantheist, or any other mix.
  9. Posted by Lee Thomas
    | Quote | Trackback | Link #110714
    Lee Thomas I grew up in a family that never attended church. My grandmother lived with us and she had never attended church for the 70 plus years that she had been alive when moving in with us. My brothers never went to church. My sisters never went to church. I do not recall ever seeing a bible in my home nor can I ever recall any conversations about God, Religion or Christianity. When I was about 10 I was invited to Bible school by a friend. I went. It was fun. I do not remember a thing about it other then sitting in the basement of a church talking about GOD. I think that was my first real thoughts about God. Those thoughts soon disappeared after the week of bible school was over. Fast forward from a family that was devoid of God, Religious talk or spiritual prayers of any type. My brother is now a Pastor. My other brother is a christian. My sister takes my mother to church every week. I am a christian. So in response to Mr. Evil up there. He is wrong. My entire family is living proof that people become religious for reasons other then being taught from cradle to grave.
  10. Michael_Merritt
    If they wanted that they would be religious.
    Are you disputing that removing all religion from a society would not change it? I think it would. And there are people working to do just that, as much as you have fundamentalists that would like to bring us closer to a theocracy. Note that this doesn't mean I think that's a bad thing. A lot of believers think that removing God/religion will lead us on the road toward being a degenerate society, but I don't buy it. But I also don't buy that removing religion would not make the society very different.
  11. Michael_Merritt You apply a very loose standard as to who is a fundamentalist. For exampling, by applying your standard, Barack Obama is a fundamentalist because he makes religious references every now and then.