2012 May 22 |
 |
http://www.theatlanticright.com/2010/01/01/left-bloggers-death-wish-for-limbaugh-shows-futility-of-political-blogosphere/
0
0
  |   14 comments

To listen to the left side of the blogosphere, it is exclusively conservatives and Republicans that are the carriers of hatred and intolerance. Any and all dissent from the left-leaning consensus is attributed to racism, hatred, and intolerance.

In recent weeks, the cause for outrage on the left has been the alleged wishing on the part of a few Republican leaders that the elderly Democratic Senator Robert Byrd would be medically unable to vote for cloture on health care reform. This, we were told again and again and again, was proof positive of the irredeemable viciousness and evil of Republicans and conservatives. And those (very few) conservatives who did indulge in such hateful wishing deserved the condemnation they got, even if the generalizations made about it were clearly dishonest.

Completely and willfully blind to the hypocrisy of it, however, some of the oh-so-tolerant and superior avatars of political virtue on the left side of the blogosphere have reacted to Rush Limbaugh’s hospitalization by wishing him dead or, in the alternative, wishing him in permanent pain.

I recently read that only about 5% of those admitted to hospitals with chest pains die within a year, so one important and very needed change is probably not going to happen — all the more so since most billionaires can not only afford health insurance but can afford to do without it….

No, I’m not going to descend to his level and wish him an immediate death, in fact I hope he lives long enough to see that not one dire thing he has predicted has materialized and that he’s been pretty much wrong about every thing he’s said — and until that happens, I hope those pains continue to hurt like hell.

So, to summarize, the author wishes Limbaugh dead, but then says he doesn’t really wish him dead exactly, but just in very great pain. Another author from the same site (founded by a consistently over-the-top hater named Michael Stickings who mysteriously is also an editor at “The Moderate Voice” in spite of his literally NEVER moderate viewpoints) hilariously laments the hatred that allegedly controls the right wing while shamelessly displaying his own hatred for Limbaugh in the very same post which he titles as a “death watch”:

Damn it!

Early reports had him actually dead, which means he likely suffered a very serious attack before they were able to clamp him down with bungee cords to use the AED. I wonder what whaling vessel they called in?

But I digress.

Perhaps the time has come to pronounce Limbaugh ” all but dead” and to determine what he will leave in his wake, besides a steaming trail of slug slime?

Consider the birther movement. Consider the teabaggers. Consider the hatred spewing from the extreme right wing like an oil gusher that has not yet been capped.

Limbaugh’s crime worthy of such hateful sentiments? Disagreeing with them on politics. Indeed, no greater crime is even conceivable to the hate-mongers that lecture at us from their heights in the political blogosphere.

Happy New Year. They have more of the same on the plate for everyone that disagrees with them in 2010. But all the while, you can count on them to lecture you about their moral superiority and the perpetual evil of Republicans and conservatives. Do try not to laugh milk out of your nose when you see it next time. And do not expect any of the people who lecture Republicans and conservatives about the alleged “hate” in the ranks of the right to lift a single finger to type a single letter of condemnation or even mild criticism towards the likes of “Capt. Fogg” and the other haters on the left. They know better than the apply to their own side anything like the standards they demand from others. It is considered shocking and offensive to even suggest it.

And people wonder why fewer and fewer people even bother to write for the blogosphere any more. What’s the point? It’s all just scripts and sharp-elbowed attacks these days. Relatively few bloggers care about anything but somehow “winning” in their hate-war against those who disagree, and the very few who try to sustain some kind of real discourse get shouted down or, more commonly, just plain shunned by the systematic refusal of links.

At least in the age of newspapers, you could use their work-product as a fire-starter. But all the current crop of ideological extremists produce is apathy — who wants to get involved in a political world controlled by such people as those who would wish death on people who merely disagree with them? And this kind of vileness is unfortunately not rare, it’s pretty much become routine. Brief hopes that a change of partisan power in the White House might diminish the over-the-top hatred from the “Bush Derangement Syndrome” brigades that grew to dominate the blogosphere especially after 2004 were dashed. Not only did the BDS brigades continue apparently oblivious to the change in partisan power, but they quickly expanded to Palin-hatred and other vendettas. And they were matched on the far-right by the “Obama Derangement Syndrome” and “birther” wackos.

Yes, there are a some good blogs out there that try hard to actually be FOR something and to have serious discussions about issues. The Volokh Conspiracy comes to mind, as does Althouse and the League of Ordinary Gentlemen. And there are several authors at the aforementioned “The Moderate Voice” who persist in trying to sow reason and civility even in an environment where their efforts are often disrespected and tarnished by the vicious behavior of some of their own invited co-bloggers, like Michael Stickings and the even more hateful Kathy Kattenburg. But if you look at the blogs that tend to dominate the links on Memeorandum as well as those that tend to get cited as most prominent among “new media” outlets — blogs like FireDogLake (who recently suggested that Joe Lieberman’s wife should be prevented from advocated for breast cancer research as a punishment for his dissent on health care reform), Huffington Post (where a contributor once openly called for a military coup against Pres. George W. Bush), Andrew Sullivan (who’s hatred of Sarah Palin has abandoned all pretense of civility or even sanity), Matthew Yglesias and Ezra Klein (both of whom discovered that both dissent and the filibuster are intolerable and evil only months after championing both as primary virtues of American politics), it quickly becomes apparent that the dominant technique towards disagreement is not debate, but rather demonization, and that “dissent is patriotic” (or, for that matter, tolerable) only during Republican presidencies. As for any new issue that comes up, be assured, the partisan scripts are already written and no deviations will be allowed.

The hypocrisy and hate is shameful. It also appears to be a permanent feature of the blogosphere. The trolls have taken over, and they run the show now.

What a waste. It coulda been a show. Instead, it’s just a freak show.

  1. Michael Merritt I was pretty disgusted at some of the stuff I saw last night. That said, I haven't gotten quite as pessimistic about the blogosphere as you have. If you filter out the horrible, you can find some gems. Even a PDS-er like Sullivan is mostly on form when he's not raving over Palin.
  2. | Quote | Trackback | Link #107986
    Jason Arvak The trouble is that one has to spend more time filtering all the time. The gems are becoming more rare and the garbage is so common that it has become not only acceptable, but in many areas, also mandatory. Also, what I really object to is not the garbage itself, but the complete lack of accountability for the people who (1) set themselves up as arbiters over what are de facto best practices, (2) are widely recognized and rewarded for that claimed role, and (3) turn around and practice exactly what they otherwise condemn whenever doing so serves a purely partisan agenda. And if you DARE to criticize them for it, the hypocrisy is exacerbated by brute retaliation or, more often, the criticism is simply ignored, not only by the target, but by everyone.
  3. Michael Merritt
    The trouble is that one has to spend more time filtering all the time.
    I don't know, maybe I just find it easier to do. I ignore and postings Stickings and Kattenburg, because I know their stuff will be garbage. I used to go to FireDogLake, but usually just ignore them, too. This has side effects, I'd guess. Ignoring what they're writing doesn't allow you to criticize them for it. I guess I'd just rather spend time reading the better stuff. I'd ignore the equivalent people from the other side, too, but I actually do agree with them sometimes.
    Also, what I really object to is not the garbage itself, but the complete lack of accountability for the people who (1) set themselves up as arbiters over what are de facto best practices, (2) are widely recognized and rewarded for that claimed role, and (3) turn around and practice exactly what they otherwise condemn whenever doing so serves a purely partisan agenda. And if you DARE to criticize them for it, the hypocrisy is exacerbated by brute retaliation or, more often, the criticism is simply ignored, not only by the target, but by everyone.
    Honestly don't have a good response for this. I have seen it, too, but it doesn't make me want to stop blogging. Can make me a cynic, but not enough to just give up entirely.
  4. Pingback | Link #108003
    On Left Bloggers’ Death-Wish For Limbaugh | NewsReal Blog [...] Read the whole thing at PoliGazette. VN:F [1.7.9_1023]please wait...Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast) [...]
  5. Posted by Doomed
    | Quote | Trackback | Link #108016
    Doomed Actually I have heard over the months and years that many on the left want to WATERBOARD republicans. Here is another example of them wanting to see their political adversaries be tortured, punished and suffer physical pain and suffering just long enough to soothe their own morbid sense of social deviance which of course we cannot discuss without being politically correct. We all know its only the Conservatives who want to waterboard everyone in site. The left wants to give a pass to terrorists while waterboarding and executing their fellow Americans whom they simply disagree with politically. "If I had my way, I would see Katherine Harris and Ken Blackwell strapped down to electric chairs and lit up like Christmas trees. The better to light the way for American Democracy and American Freedom!" -- Democratic Talk Radio's Stephen Crockett Do I hate them? NO...."I hate the republicans and everything they stand for." Howard Dean.
  6. Posted by Tully
    | Quote | Trackback | Link #108019
    Tully Dead on target, Jason. CPD™ in action. The same attack-dog robo-think tendency is hardly missing on the right, but IMHO is not nearly as pronounced. Or maybe just not quite as vicious. On the left it seems to be SOP, even among otherwise purportedly intelligent and capable bloggers/writers. Regardless, when it pops up it destroys any chance of a substantive discussion of issues, of any exploration of the common ground so sorely needed for crafting practical political solutions. No matter how erudite, a screamfest is still a screamfest, and the unleashed hatred still vile. (Nice to see your pixels again, a very Happy New Year to you and yours, and to all those here at the 'Gazette.)
  7. Michael Merritt
    Doomed :

    Actually I have heard over the months and years that many on the left want to WATERBOARD republicans.

    Only example I know is Sean Hannity, who actually offered to go through it, but to date has not.
  8. | Quote | Trackback | Link #108023
    Jason Arvak No, Michael, there are quite a few lefty bloggers who have called for torturing (or just beating up) Republicans and/or conservatives that dare to express dissent. Combined with the fact that they oppose torture for al-Qaeda operatives, that should give you some idea of exactly how high a priority they place on "thought crimes" -- to them, it is apparently worse than mass murder. Even if it is only rhetoric, it is an indication of a deep-seated hatred at the very core of the current far left.
  9. Michael Merritt Must be at one of those blogs/blog posts I ignore. Care to post a link or three? You can email them if you wish. I could do with a little riling up. Gets the creative juices flowing, see? Though perhaps I'm just a glutton for torture (so to speak). Edit: Just saw this comment in a post at Ordinary Gentlemen, and thought it provided an appropriate explanation for why we see all the nastiness in the blogosphere:
    Technology has allowed in the last 15 years a removal of the filters which constrained the transfer of someone’s inner dialogue to the public square. Ergo, you have more crude and stupid opinions crossing into your field of vision. There has also been a secular decay in manners public and private in society at large.
  10. | Quote | Trackback | Link #108058
    Jason Arvak I googled "waterboard Beck" and got 4 quick hits that you can replicate, Michael. I seriously doubt that "waterboard Limbaugh" and other easy-to-conceive combinations wouldn't also return similar results.
  11. Posted by c3
    | Quote | Trackback | Link #108183
    c3 I just wonder if part of this is due to the early development of blogosphere punditocracy happening in the last 8+ years (read "Bush era") and that we're simply working our way through the first generation of political blogs. If true then those on the left will have a hard time not seeing the world through the "era of Bush" prism. It may also be why so many "discussions" use GW Bush as a reference point
  12. | Quote | Trackback | Link #108187
    Jason Arvak Because the blogosphere seems uniquely prone to group-think (blogs overwhelmingly tend only to link to others with similar ideological views -- some even have official or de facto policies to that effect), whatever tendency towards leftism that dominates in the first generation will tend to only become more extreme in that direction over time.
  13. Pingback | Link #108207
    “Can you imagine if an Obama effigy were hung from a noose?” And Other Thoughts On Modern Politics | The League of Ordinary Gentlemen [...] speculation and debate while the Rush Limbaugh death watch has PoliGazzette’s Jason Arvak sounding the death knell for relevance, focus, and seriousness in political blogging (due exception to the League noted), [...]
  14. Pingback | Link #108208
    “Can you imagine if an Obama effigy were hung from a noose?” And Other Thoughts On Modern Politics | The League of Ordinary Gentlemen [...] speculation and debate while the Rush Limbaugh death watch has PoliGazzette’s Jason Arvak sounding the death knell for relevance, focus, and seriousness in political blogging (due exception to the League noted), [...]