2012 May 22 |
 |
http://www.theatlanticright.com/2009/09/30/britains-gordon-brown-lives-in-lala-land/
0
0

brownDefinite proof that Britain’s Gordon Brown is living in Lala-Land:

In a BBC Radio Four interview at the Labour conference in Brighton, the Prime Minister accepted that the Conservatives are the clear favourites to win the general election next year, but insisted he can still win over the “mainstream middle” of Britain.

Admitting the odds are against him and his party, he said: “I accept we are the insurgents, we are not the incumbents.”

When told that winning would be extremely difficult for the Social Democrats of Labor, Brown said: “Everything has been hard. My life has been about fighting against difficulties that sometimes appear insuperable.”

True enough – and most of those difficulties Brown ran into had to do with his own character and leadership style. The prime minister is one of the most difficult men in British politics. There’s no reasoning with him. He’s as Machiavellian as they come.

Not only did Brown said he believes Labor can win next year’s elections, he also lashed out at Tory leader David Cameron accusing him of - oh no, the horror! – being raised in an upper-middle class family.

It’s a deadly attack, I’m sure.

Brown has run out of time. He succeeded Blair when the latter resigned, even though a majority of Brits did not want him to. He became prime minister by circumventing elections rather than by winning them.

Once in power, Brown destroyed the economy, weakened Britain internationally, felt the heat in his own party and expanded Britain’s vast Big Brother-like programs.

In other words, it’s time for Brown to go and be replaced by a moderate conservative who is able and willing to govern responsibly.

  1. Posted by Jay_C
    | Quote | Trackback | Link #102794
    Jay_C "he also lashed out at Tory leader David Cameron accusing him of - oh no, the horror! – being raised in an upper-middle class family" Growing up in a lower-middle class household, I find that just revolting.. The shame.... :) Do they really think that the mainstream of the people have changed that much in after this economic crisis that they are ready to get out pitchforks against the rich? Sure, some are... But not the mainstream... I really believe that these "social-types" either believe this themselves (ironically many of them in power are unaware, or chose to believe they are hypocrites as they have plenty of money themselves), or they really think that mainstream people are really that stupid, and that the truth will never get out. The latter borders on sinister… “Wile E. Coyote Acme rocket” stupid sinister, but sinister none the less.
  2. Michael Merritt
    He became prime minister by circumventing elections rather than by winning them.
    A bit of a nitpick I suppose, but John Major became Prime Minister in the exact same way Brown did. The 2007 leadership election was more of a presumption on Brown than the 1990 one was on Major, I suppose, but nobody forced the MPs to vote for him. Major did win in his own right in 1992, and Brown will face the same contest in less than a year. His prospects seem a lot dimmer than Major's did, but you never know what will happen. Lets see what happens next year. If the Conservative Party wins, then we can start talking about Brown as an unelected Prime Minister.