2012 May 22 |
 |
http://www.theatlanticright.com/2009/06/01/abortion-doctor-murdered/
0
0
  |   103 comments

george-tillerDr. George Tiller, a famous abortion provider in Wichita, Kansas, has been murdered on his way to church today. Anti-abortion groups were quick to condemn the use of violence in the service of their cause, but that hasn’t prevented the liberal blogosphere from once again using such a tragedy as a tool with which to try to tar and feather anyone who disagrees with their purist position.

The abortion issue is a classic case of an issue that is entirely controlled by extremists. On the anti-abortion side, demonizing rhetoric about “baby killers” is all too easy a hook for a few mentally unstable fanatics who are all too willing to commit murder and feel like they are somehow saving lives in the process. And the pro-abortion side dishonestly conflates anyone who might have doubts about abortion at 8.5 months with the murderous wackos who kill abortion doctors, thus shutting down all debate and excluding even the possibility of a moderate position.

Which is worse? Clearly, those who commit murder in the service of their political cause win that dubious award. But those who exploit those incidents to try to end the debate over their own variety of political extremism are contemptible nonetheless. (Yes, Andrew Sullivan, I’m talking about you.) And anyone reading the comment sections must wonder if the potential for violence here is really only on one side. But those who actually read this post before commenting on it (a minority, according to my observations) should take note of the fact that I am NOT claiming equivalency between an anti-abortion murderer and a pro-abortion rhetorical bully.

But the message to the pro-abortion purists and anti-”Christianist” bigots in the blogosphere who are exploiting this crime in the service of their longstanding vendettas against all conservatives is that being better than a murderer doesn’t make you good.

UPDATE: If there were any doubt about the extreme ends that some on the pro-abortion side are willing to go to try to use this tragedy to advance their broader vendetta of hatred against conservatives, I offer this link, also because the author in question has been spamming this thread with his vulgarity and hate and linking to him after banning him might give him some annoyance that he deserves.

  1. | Quote | Trackback | Link #96187
    Jason Arvak
    A.Sullivan have never proposed legisltation to curb or alter others’ religious beliefs or practices while groups like the Mormons have done exactly that.
    This gratuitous insult against Mormons is false, slanderous, and offensive. The Mormons have never proposed a law to make their religious practices mandatory. In fact, the Mormons include religious freedom among their most basic "Articles of Faith" (basically the Mormon equivalent of the Nicene Creed -- the most basic canonical summary of official Church doctrine) -- I know of NO other religion that incorporates that principle at the most fundamental doctrinal level like that. Historically, the Mormons have been a target of government repression, not the initiators. You should read the history of the pogroms against Mormons and the "order of extermination" issued against them by the governor of Missouri. I flatly state that YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT, you are just regurgitating anti-Mormon talking points. Most of the rest of the comment was agreeable until I got to this completely unnecessary slam on Mormons. Once it appears, accusations of anti-Mormon prejudice on your part are completely understandable -- if not for hatred against Mormons, why bring them up on this thread at all? You ask that we make distinctions about how some pro-abortion people are different from others, yet you make sweeping, no-exceptions hateful comments about religious people. You are personifying that which you criticize. I am both anti-abortion and pro-choice (I think abortion is immoral but that it should be legal because the state does not have a clear secular case to be made regarding its immorality). I am a former but not current Mormon (thus I am neither a water-carrier for the LDS Church nor an anti-Mormon). I condemn anti-abortion extremist rhetoric AND violence without equivocation (thus, I cannot be accused of making excuses for anti-abortion extremism). I think Fred Phelps is simultaneously an abomination and a sick joke on humanity (don't even try to insult me or anyone else here by linking us to Phelps). I say these things as a way of preempting the inevitable attacks against my integrity that are the usual response to me calling out a lefty on their various prejudices against religions and especially against Mormons. The existence of bigotry and extremism on the other side does not excuse yours, so don't even try. Prejudice is just wrong, it is not some comparative contest where you are ok as long as you have an excuse to claim that the other side is worse. You owe an apology.
  2. Posted by Sara
    | Quote | Trackback | Link #96450
  3. Posted by bc
    | Quote | Trackback | Link #96546
    bc @Jason Arvak hm i dont think anybody is actually pro abortion... that doesnt really make sense. I doubt there is anybody in the world who is like "HEY EVERYBODY LETS GO HAVE AN ABORTION ONCE WE GET PREGNANT." but those are just my thoughts...