2012 May 21 |
 |
http://www.theatlanticright.com/2009/01/07/war-in-gaza-causes-outbursts-of-anti-semitism-in-europe/
0
0
  |   15 comments

Whenever violence erupts between Israel and Hamas, or any other Palestinian organization, anti-Semitic attacks in Europe increase significantly. This year is no different: a car hit a synagogue in France, for instance. When police investigated the matter they found several molotov cocktails in the car and several others in other cars parked nearby.

In the United Kingdom too, anti-Semites are having a field day. They attack synagogues, Jewish shops and organizations and even individual Jews on a daily basis. Several Jewish organizations in Britain have warned the government that anti-Semitic attacks have increased so significantly that many Jews do no longer feel safe in their own neighborhood, let alone in their own country.

When a Jew opens the door of his home to walk to his car to go to work, Arabic anti-Semites walk up to him, start chanting anti-Semitic slogans, pull him out of his car when he finally gets in it, and physically assault him. On other occasions British Jews see angry British Arabs shout angry slogans, walk to Jewish shops, surround them and attack them by throwing stones. Another British Jew wakes up one day, goes to his own restaurant and sees anti-Semitic graffiti on its walls and windows.

The war in Gaza is, to a large degree, terrible. But even if you are pro-Palestinian, it is completely absurd to attack Jews living in Britain for what you consider a crime perpetrated by Israel. If Westerners such as myself would follow the same reasoning, they should attack Arabs and Arab shops everywhere whenever a terrorist blows himself up or whenever an Arabic regime or organization does something we consider a crime and / or unacceptable. If the anger would be directed at Muslims, as Arab Brits do towards Jews now, even I would be assaulted when a Muslim country or organization commits a crime or act against Christians or Jews (for the purpose of this article I follow their reasoning a bit; I don’t agree of course that Israel is committing a crime by attacking Hamas in Gaza).

Furthermore, perhaps these Arabs (because this is what they are; it is always interesting to see that most  Muslims of other races go about their business, attacking no one) should be reminded of the Qur’an and of what it says about attacking innocent people. It repeats in verse after verse that one should only fight when given no other option and that only those fighting against one should be attacked (see for instance) Qur’an 2:190-192, 4:36, 5:32, 25:68, 60:8-9). The last one: “God does not forbid you from being good to those who have not fought you over religion or driven you from your homes, or from being just towards them.” Since British Jews have nothing and I do mean nothing to do with whatever it is the state of Israel does, attacking them or even disliking them is unislamic behavior, not worthy of a Muslim. Qur’an 5:8 adds: “You who believe! Show integrity for the sake of God, bearing witness with justice. Do not let hatred for a people incite you into not being just. Be just. That is closer to heedfulness. Heed God (alone). God is aware of what you do.”

Behave in a just manner. Being just is key to being a good Muslim. “Be good to your parents and relatives and to orphans and the very poor, and to neighbors who are related to you and neighbors who are not related to you, and to companions and travelers and your slaves. God does not love anyone vain or boastful” (Qur’an 4:36). And “a good deed and a bad deed are not the same. Repel the bad with something better and, if there is enmity between you and someone else, he will be like a bosom friend” (Qur’an 41:34).

Lastly three other things Arabic Muslims who attack Jews should keep in mind: “When they are told, ‘Do not cause corruption on the earth,’ they say, ‘We are only putting things right.’ No indeed! They are the corrupters, but they are not aware of it” (Qur’an 2:11-12). “Those who believe, those who are Jews, and the Christians and Sabaeans, all who believe in God and the Last Day and act rightly, will have their reward with their Lord. They will feel no fear and will know no sorrow” (Qur’an 2:62). “The desert Arabs are the worst in disbelief and hypocrisy, and more fitted to be ignorant of the limits which God has sent down to His Messenger. But God is Knowing, Wise” (Qur’an 9:97).

In their attempt to appease these groups, Western governments are making a tragic mistake by rationalizing anti-Semitism. These attacks and clear hatred for an entire people – not caused by this year’s attack on Gaza; it merely functions as an excuse – should be condoned nor tolerated. Zero tolerance should be applied to all those who attack Jews out of anti-Semitism. If Western governments do not act now, the problem will get worse, and we will face serious problems of anti-Semitism in the years and decades ahead.

  1. Posted by marc
    | Quote | Trackback | Link #81813
    marc Being just is key to being a good person, period.
  2. Posted by Bruno DeGourville
    | Quote | Trackback | Link #81820
    Bruno DeGourville Dear Michael: As a muslim myself i find it not only important to stress the spiritual and moral perspective on the current crisis in Gaza and acts of racism towards jews but critical. ( just so that we're clear on the language used: the acts of aggression you mention towards jews are acts of racism not anti-Semitism. As you probably know arabs are also Semites, which makes this issue a question of racism and not anti-Semitism. And racism is certainly not condoned by God). It is though a serious mistake to lead your readers into believing that such attacks come from arabs exclusively when you use the rather unusual and confusing term: "Arabic anti-Semites". Jews in Europe and in Great Britain in particular are targeted not only by arabs but by Pakistanis, Bengalis, South-East Asians, Turks....not to mention the traditional European Jew hater! And to my knowledge, those are not arabic people. But it is as a muslim that i want to comment on your post. As persons of faith who believe in God, it is important for us to be reminded of God's commands, especially in time of spiritual and emotional challenges, and try to steer away from impulses and crimes of passion. Also, through your many postings, you have made your support for Israel's current course of action not only unequivocal but unconditional. Now allow me to hold you on to the same thinking process that leads you and me to condemn such unjust hateful attacks on Jews in the streets of London, Paris or Saint Petersburg: what makes the innocent Jew living his life in London or Paris more deserving of restrain and compassion from British or French muslims than the Gazan trying to go about his life with no food no fuel no electricity? Isn't here the Israeli disproportionate bombardment tantamount to "racism" if not "crime against humanity? (let me remind you that we're talking about over 700 deaths so far!) How would you feel about muslims or anyone for that matter going on a rampage in the streets of London killing 700 Jews as retaliation for actions committed by the IDF? Allowing our emotions, political, spiritual or intellectual positioning regarding the crisis in the Middle East to overrule our deep sense of justice is what hampers our ability to broker peace in the Middle East. Racial hatred is racial hatred no matter where, no matter who.
  3. Michael van der Galien
    Also, through your many postings, you have made your support for Israel’s current course of action not only unequivocal but unconditional.
    That is quite simply not correct I am afraid. Did you read my post criticizing Israel over the bombing of a mosque, for instance? Click here to read it.
    Allowing our emotions, political, spiritual or intellectual positioning regarding the crisis in the Middle East to overrule our deep sense of justice is what hampers our ability to broker peace in the Middle East. Racial hatred is racial hatred no matter where, no matter who.
    Agreed, but that is not the position I take. By the way, I should have taken the time to thank Harun Yahya (I will do so here), whose real name is Adnan Oktar, for some of the Qur'an quotes; he made the Muslim case against terrorism very well in "Islam Denounces Terrorism." I think you will enjoy my review of this book, which will be published here Friday Bruno.
  4. Posted by Bruno DeGourville
    | Quote | Trackback | Link #81836
    Bruno DeGourville Dear Micheal: I am sorry if i misread you or inconsiderately jumped into conclusion regarding your support of Israel. But rereading your posts, it still seems to me that you do support their daily bombardment of Gaza. And that's what i question in my last comment. It is this position that i try to put in contrast with this current post of yours, namely: pro-palestinians attacking jews in Europe for what the IDF does is unfair and terrible. You did indeed criticized and condemned their bombardment of a mosque but not their bombardment in general. And here i am asking you again what is the difference between a muslim in the street of London going on a jews killing rampage, angry at the IDF's action against the population of Gaza, and the Israeli army going on a killing rampage in the streets of Gaza for actions committed by an armed faction, namely Hamas? As appalling as Hamas attempt to use the population as a shield, it is appalling to me as a human being to see such a modern sophisticated army behave in such a ruthless manner. I honestly do hope that you see the similarity between both behaviors and come to the same conclusion as i or Marc have: "Being just is key to being a good person, period." I would agree that Israel is in a very tight position and that they need to do something about Hamas launching missiles targeting civilians. And I am sorry that i have no easy solution to this problem.But i see enough convergence of views between arab regional powers (like Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Jordan to name a few) and Israel to hope for a more peaceful and strategically sound solution. And again,deep in my heart, i remain convinced that collective punishment is never an answer, but rather a spoiler. I will be looking forward to reading your review of Harun Yahya's book. Respectfully, Bruno.
  5. Posted by Armand Sag
    | Quote | Trackback | Link #81843
    Armand Sag Anti-Semitism in Europe... I still remember the days that Israel couldn't do anything wrong in the eyes of Europe. To quote the Dutch minister of Foreign Affairs Schmelzer, who in 1973 right after the Yom Kippoer War, where almost a milion Palestines/Arabs were forced into exile stated "What are 'Palestines'? Aren't they Arabs?", and in doing so not acknowledging the Palestine peoples or their right to self-determination. We have come a long way from then...
  6. Posted by Bruno DeGourville
    | Quote | Trackback | Link #81856
    Bruno DeGourville Armand Sag: No matter what control the Jewish lobby has on the media, no matter what image they have in the world, it seems to me that there is still growing anti-semitism, not only in Europe but in the US too. I've seen some signs of it in the subway of NYC (there is supposedly more jews in NYC than in Israel itself) that you would never have seen 10 years ago. It's a fact, and acknowledging this fact doesn't necessarily entail blind support or adoration of Israel or what it does. spktruthtopower: Thanks for your clarification between anti-semitism and anti-zionism. I do agree and share with you a profound dislike of zionism. The movement was mainly secular in its origins, beginning largely as a response by European Jewry to antisemitism across Europe. It is a branch of the broader phenomenon of modern nationalism. Unfortunately i, like so many others find myself caught in the popular media discourse that too often sacrifice terminology accuracy to editorial impact. Alhtough i do find Armand and Spktruthtopower's comments interesting and worth pondering, they don't help me understand why Michael van der Galien supports the current bombing of Gazans as a collective punishment for Hamas's actions, but he is willing to denounce Muslims in the streets of Europe attacking innocent jewish citizens. What makes the attack of an innocent civilian in London more criminal than the killing of an innocent Palestinian in the streets of Gaza? Bruno.
  7. Michael van der Galien Bruno; I was writing a response to you, but it became rather long. So, instead of posting it as a comment, I decided to put it into a post for the blog, added something to it, etc. When done, I put it on the timer. It will be published later today (3PM ET).
  8. Posted by C Stanley
    | Quote | Trackback | Link #81865
    C Stanley Bruno- I look forward to reading Michael's response to you later but wanted to share my take on your question (re: difference between Israel harming civilians in Gaza vs. Muslims in Europe harming Jewish civilians.) To me those situations are so obviously different because I see Israel acting in whatever way it is possible to engage an enemy which fights in a cowardly manner. Israel can't ignore an enemy which will not lay down it's arms until Israel is destroyed. The citizens who coexist in Europe are not in that situation at all, therefore there is no need for anything other than expression of differing views through peaceful manner. Israel isn't just angry and taking out anger on innocent victims, it's attempting to carry out a military action on an enemy which provoked this response, under impossible circumstances. That doesn't change the tragedy of the civilian deaths, but intent does matter when assigning culpability.
  9. Posted by Bruno DeGourville
    | Quote | Trackback | Link #81871
    Bruno DeGourville C. Stanley: You are right in that in one case the persons are in a constant state of war, and in the the other it is peace and democracy. And again i don't pretend to hold the answers to Israel dilemma. But by taking this perspective to answer my question you decide to enter the realm of war ethics, and legality. And I am no expert in either field. The only prism through which i can ponder and evaluate the crisis, the only one i have in common with you and most readers (at least i hope) is one's sense of humanity. And seen through a purely humanistic perspective, attacking an innocent person for the deeds of others is wrong, no matter where, no matter who, no matter when, no matter how much. It is just morally wrong even under a repressive regime. I don't think anyone still in touch with his humanity would argue with that. But again i could be wrong. So many people decide to ignore the humanity of the opposing party. It is so much easier to fight your enemy when you feel that you have less than a human-being in front of you. Furthermore, if i were to follow your reasoning, i would argue that palestinians in Gaza have no other means to express their frustrations or resentment towards what they consider occupation. They have after all been under a rather strict blockade for 18 months. You can see that here again, you and I get stuck in that vicious circle that consist of assigning blames rather than finding solutions. It's been their attitudes in the Middle East from the beginning, and we allowed them to drag us in their emotional and political dysfunction. When you say that "intent does matter when assigning culpability." , i don't think it is my nor your duty or responsibility to assign culpability.I think it is naive for you and me, people so far removed from the arcane of foreign policy (although you might be closer than i assume), to try to evaluate, gauge or guess the "intent" of the main actors in the Middle East. Bruno.
  10. Posted by Jay_C
    | Quote | Trackback | Link #81873
    Jay_C True Bruno, the innocent regardless of your stance on this (pro Israel of pro Palestinean) are the ones that are hurting the most... Since Israel began a ground offensive Saturday, most of the dead and wounded arriving at Shifa are civilians, as Israel’s offensive shifts from airstrikes to artillery shelling and fighting close to densely populated areas. I am not defending or supporting either side in this statement, inocents are taking the brunt of this.
  11. Posted by C Stanley
    | Quote | Trackback | Link #81875
    C Stanley Furthermore, if i were to follow your reasoning, i would argue that palestinians in Gaza have no other means to express their frustrations or resentment towards what they consider occupation. Perhaps this would be a legitimate argument if not for the fact that the Palestinians have in fact had the means to elect leadership other than those who insist on destruction of Israel. You're right that they've suffered from a blockade (and scarcity of all basic human needs, food, water, fuel, etc) for the past 18 months, yet as pointed out very cogently here:
    To give a little context to what has caused Israel to finally act against Hamas in Gaza after 3+ years let's look at what Hamas has actually done. Let's start with the period of Aug. 15, 2005 – Jan. 25, 2006. That's the period between Israel's evacuation of Gaza and the election of Hamas. In that period of time, Israel was attacked by rockets and mortars an average of 15 times a month. Between the time of the Hamas election and it's Gaza coup (Jan. 25, 2006 – June 14, 2007), the attack average was 102 a month, an increase of 650%. From the Hamas’ takeover and the start of the Tahadiya or State of Calm (June 14, 2007 – June 16, 2008), the average increased to 361 attacks per month. That's an additional 350% increase. Now, those rocket and mortar shells were coming from someone and somewhere. And while there are those who would like to pretend they were homemade, we've since found out that they've come in from Iran and China. Unless those two countries are giving these things away, Hamas has been buying them. So instead of spending money for food and humanitarian supplies, apparently Hamas opted for weaponry and aggression. Somehow, however, it is Israel's fault that the humanitarian flow of goods into Gaza is down to a trickle, in the face of an average of 361 rocket and mortar attacks a month of imported weaponry.
    To recap: their elected leaders meanwhile somehow had the means to purchase and stockpile thousands of weapons. Does it never occur to them to consider the weaponry that is omnipresent when food and water and medical supplies are not? And that what Hamas (and Jimmy Carter) call a 'defensive tunnel' can be dug but never a shelter for women and children? Mind you, I would not go so far as to say that the Palestinians are deserving of the current attacks for having voted in these thugs as their leaders. But I would say that they've unwittingly allowed themselves to become hostages of terrorists.
  12. Posted by C Stanley
    | Quote | Trackback | Link #81878
    C Stanley Bruno, while I think you have the best of intentions, my conviction is that it's a copout to say that we can't judge intentions. When certain people have murderous or genocidal intentions, then all of their actions have to be judged on that basis- otherwise we fail to do all that we can to stop evil.
  13. Posted by Bruno DeGourville
    | Quote | Trackback | Link #81881
    Bruno DeGourville C Stanley i think you have the best of intentions too, but through your last comment i feel dragged into a discourse that i want to avoid: the "he said, he did, and you said you did...". The Palestinians say they kept shelling Israel because they didn't honor their part of the bargain (namely lifting the bockade) the Israelis say they didn't lift it because Hamas didn't stop their shelling! I don't think neither one of us has all the details and are in position high enough politically to judge as you are so readily inclined to do. But what i know, and we all witnessed it in the past, is that at one point in history, when there was a common goal among world powers that valued human dignity, the UN was born and was given the tools and moral ground to make peace or at least contribute to it. Many success came out of its endeavor. I see no reason why we couldn't do it once more between Israel and Palestine. Why not send a UN peacekeeping force that monitors the cease fire. Why do we agree to send UN peacekeeping forces all over the world but to Israel and Palestine? We are giving the UN so much money, we are giving Egypt, Israel and the Palestinians so much too! And we're incapable of imposing a cease fire and monitor it for the good not only of our foreign policy and economy but for the world's too? Something doesn't make sense to me.
  14. Posted by C Stanley
    | Quote | Trackback | Link #81884
    C Stanley I think the missing part of the puzzle there, Bruno, is the will on the part of the UN to impartially monitor a cease fire. There are numerous data points to support this view- for instance, that the UN has not treated the Palestinian refugees in the same manner as it has all other cases of refugees (attempting to return them to normal living conditions as quickly as possible.) Instead, they've remained as pawns in the scheme to keep the conflict broiling. Or take the facts that we've recently been discussing about UN schools and other facilities being used by the terrorists to hide and fire upon Israelis during conflicts (even as the UN also permits or perhaps even designates these facilities as shelter for civilians- thus guaranteeing that the civilians will be in harm's way.) I just see very little to hope for in the sense of the UN being an honest peace mediator in this process. Perhaps having more involvement from interested parties like Turkey and Egypt- and by interested, what I mean is that they're truly interested in calm and peace in their backyard- then maybe this time there will be a cease fire which has some chance of being monitored and sustained. I think you've hit the nail on the head though, in terms of the problem. Until the terms of a cease fire can actually be enforced, there will be no trust or feeling of security for the various parties and thus both sides will consider actions of the other to be breaches which justify their own responses.
  15. Pingback | Link #82252
    This just in: “Gaza mission a failure” and “I told you so” | Jewschool [...] relations are freezing, the northern front with Lebanon simmers, anti-Semitic incidents the world over are increasing, and the Arab world is [...]