﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Save the Environment: Let Planes Crash</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theatlanticright.com/2008/09/06/save-the-environment-let-planes-crash/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theatlanticright.com/2008/09/06/save-the-environment-let-planes-crash/</link>
	<description>Because Common Sense Transcends Distance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 06:43:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin H</title>
		<link>http://www.theatlanticright.com/2008/09/06/save-the-environment-let-planes-crash/comment-page-1/#comment-66495</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 18:44:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://poligazette.com/2008/09/06/save-the-environment-let-planes-crash/#comment-66495</guid>
		<description>Or you could, oh I don&#039;t know. Put some more insulation on the fuel lines?

&quot;They are likely to include demanding stricter tests on engines to ensure that they can cope with a build up of ice and sudden release into the fuel system.&quot;

Even the article you link to suggests that safety and fuel efficiency are compatible.

The truth is that environmental activists DON&#039;T want planes to crash, so no, you aren&#039;t just speaking the truth. 

Is the sierra club up in arms about this idea to revisit the problem? Is anyone? You have made a pretty good straw environmentalist, but I&#039;d like to see some actual flesh and blood. Even if you find one nutjob painting anyone who supports fuel efficiency standards with that brush is dishonest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or you could, oh I don&#8217;t know. Put some more insulation on the fuel lines?</p>
<p>&quot;They are likely to include demanding stricter tests on engines to ensure that they can cope with a build up of ice and sudden release into the fuel system.&quot;</p>
<p>Even the article you link to suggests that safety and fuel efficiency are compatible.</p>
<p>The truth is that environmental activists DON&#8217;T want planes to crash, so no, you aren&#8217;t just speaking the truth. </p>
<p>Is the sierra club up in arms about this idea to revisit the problem? Is anyone? You have made a pretty good straw environmentalist, but I&#8217;d like to see some actual flesh and blood. Even if you find one nutjob painting anyone who supports fuel efficiency standards with that brush is dishonest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

