﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: McCain Not in &#8220;Cone of Silence&#8221; During First Half Hour of Warren Forum</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theatlanticright.com/2008/08/18/mccain-not-in-cone-of-silence-during-first-half-hour-of-warren-forum/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theatlanticright.com/2008/08/18/mccain-not-in-cone-of-silence-during-first-half-hour-of-warren-forum/</link>
	<description>Because Common Sense Transcends Distance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 06:43:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Interested</title>
		<link>http://www.theatlanticright.com/2008/08/18/mccain-not-in-cone-of-silence-during-first-half-hour-of-warren-forum/comment-page-1/#comment-64579</link>
		<dc:creator>Interested</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 08:04:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://poligazette.com/2008/08/18/mccain-not-in-cone-of-silence-during-1st-half-of-warren-forum/#comment-64579</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Elrod at TMV
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Elrod actually spent time pondering the Coin Toss?  Did Elrod ponder the fact that Wouldn&#039;t Obama simply say - what coin toss?  Just helps to enforce that TMV is still not worthy of my visiting it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Elrod at TMV
</p></blockquote>
<p>Elrod actually spent time pondering the Coin Toss?  Did Elrod ponder the fact that Wouldn&#8217;t Obama simply say &#8211; what coin toss?  Just helps to enforce that TMV is still not worthy of my visiting it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Black Shards, In Your Eyes, Blinding &#187; McCain, Crosses, and Silence</title>
		<link>http://www.theatlanticright.com/2008/08/18/mccain-not-in-cone-of-silence-during-first-half-hour-of-warren-forum/comment-page-1/#comment-64562</link>
		<dc:creator>Black Shards, In Your Eyes, Blinding &#187; McCain, Crosses, and Silence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 02:27:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://poligazette.com/2008/08/18/mccain-not-in-cone-of-silence-during-1st-half-of-warren-forum/#comment-64562</guid>
		<description>[...] it&#8217;s only natural that the left wing would try to discredit his performance by claiming that he cheated and that he [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] it&#8217;s only natural that the left wing would try to discredit his performance by claiming that he cheated and that he [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Merritt</title>
		<link>http://www.theatlanticright.com/2008/08/18/mccain-not-in-cone-of-silence-during-first-half-hour-of-warren-forum/comment-page-1/#comment-64543</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Merritt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 22:46:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://poligazette.com/2008/08/18/mccain-not-in-cone-of-silence-during-1st-half-of-warren-forum/#comment-64543</guid>
		<description>MichaelS: Interestingly, the first question is the one both candidates were given ahead of time.  Warren explains this in the CNN interview.

Jason: Are we twins or something?  After the forum, and seeing the response to my entry about it, I was thinking of a possible continuation to your entry on scripts, based on blog commenters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MichaelS: Interestingly, the first question is the one both candidates were given ahead of time.  Warren explains this in the CNN interview.</p>
<p>Jason: Are we twins or something?  After the forum, and seeing the response to my entry about it, I was thinking of a possible continuation to your entry on scripts, based on blog commenters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason, Managing Editor</title>
		<link>http://www.theatlanticright.com/2008/08/18/mccain-not-in-cone-of-silence-during-first-half-hour-of-warren-forum/comment-page-1/#comment-64498</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason, Managing Editor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 17:04:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://poligazette.com/2008/08/18/mccain-not-in-cone-of-silence-during-1st-half-of-warren-forum/#comment-64498</guid>
		<description>After any political debate, the scripts from their political opponents are as predictable as the sun rising in the east:

1) Whatever the candidate did poorly is proof positive of their complete unfitness for office in every possible way. 

2) Whatever the candidate did well is proof positive that they cheated and/or are an over-prepared robot tool of their advisers.

It appears that this forum was enough like a debate to mandate use of the standardized scripts without deviation.  Yawn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After any political debate, the scripts from their political opponents are as predictable as the sun rising in the east:</p>
<p>1) Whatever the candidate did poorly is proof positive of their complete unfitness for office in every possible way. </p>
<p>2) Whatever the candidate did well is proof positive that they cheated and/or are an over-prepared robot tool of their advisers.</p>
<p>It appears that this forum was enough like a debate to mandate use of the standardized scripts without deviation.  Yawn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MichaelS</title>
		<link>http://www.theatlanticright.com/2008/08/18/mccain-not-in-cone-of-silence-during-first-half-hour-of-warren-forum/comment-page-1/#comment-64493</link>
		<dc:creator>MichaelS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 16:35:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://poligazette.com/2008/08/18/mccain-not-in-cone-of-silence-during-1st-half-of-warren-forum/#comment-64493</guid>
		<description>McCain&#039;s answer to the first question in my opinion made it clear he hadn&#039;t heard that one at least. It was somewhat stilted I thought. Meg Whitman? Didn&#039;t she support Romney?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>McCain&#8217;s answer to the first question in my opinion made it clear he hadn&#8217;t heard that one at least. It was somewhat stilted I thought. Meg Whitman? Didn&#8217;t she support Romney?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will Michelson</title>
		<link>http://www.theatlanticright.com/2008/08/18/mccain-not-in-cone-of-silence-during-first-half-hour-of-warren-forum/comment-page-1/#comment-64492</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Michelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 16:33:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://poligazette.com/2008/08/18/mccain-not-in-cone-of-silence-during-1st-half-of-warren-forum/#comment-64492</guid>
		<description>I agree.  I will take it on Faith that Rick Warren did not mean to lie, he just had to lie becuase it would look bad if everyone knew McCain was listening to the questions.   McCain did not intentionally break his promise by listening to the questions in advance, it just happened to work out that way.  Maybe God just wanted McCain to have all of the questions beforehand so he could do God&#039;s work better.  Praise Jesus.  Praise McCain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree.  I will take it on Faith that Rick Warren did not mean to lie, he just had to lie becuase it would look bad if everyone knew McCain was listening to the questions.   McCain did not intentionally break his promise by listening to the questions in advance, it just happened to work out that way.  Maybe God just wanted McCain to have all of the questions beforehand so he could do God&#8217;s work better.  Praise Jesus.  Praise McCain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.theatlanticright.com/2008/08/18/mccain-not-in-cone-of-silence-during-first-half-hour-of-warren-forum/comment-page-1/#comment-64481</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 15:03:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://poligazette.com/2008/08/18/mccain-not-in-cone-of-silence-during-1st-half-of-warren-forum/#comment-64481</guid>
		<description>Melanie sid:
&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;BTW, 3 of the Supreme’s [McCain] named as ones he would NOT choose, he vote to confirm. LOL.&quot;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;That&#039;s not necessarily a contradiction. Many reasonable people believe - although I myself am dubious - that the differing institutional roles of the Senate and the President requires that Senators should be deferential to the President&#039;s choices, exercising their advice and consent role in something akin to abuse of discretion review. According to this school of thought, only when a Presidential pick is far beyond the pale should they be voted down; Lieberman, for example, has explicitly endorsed this attitude, and the Senate Republican caucus has implicitly advanced it. How much deference is due will of course vary, but the basic premise is very widely held.

If one takes that position, and McCain has given every reason to think that he does, it follows that one would routinely vote to confirm someone that you would not yourself have nominated. Thus, McCain&#039;s statement only becomes a contradiction if one assumes an ancillary and disputed proposition: that a Senator should not vote to confirm someone they would not have nominated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Melanie sid:</p>
<blockquote><p>&quot;BTW, 3 of the Supreme’s [McCain] named as ones he would NOT choose, he vote to confirm. LOL.&quot;
</p></blockquote>
<p>That&#8217;s not necessarily a contradiction. Many reasonable people believe &#8211; although I myself am dubious &#8211; that the differing institutional roles of the Senate and the President requires that Senators should be deferential to the President&#8217;s choices, exercising their advice and consent role in something akin to abuse of discretion review. According to this school of thought, only when a Presidential pick is far beyond the pale should they be voted down; Lieberman, for example, has explicitly endorsed this attitude, and the Senate Republican caucus has implicitly advanced it. How much deference is due will of course vary, but the basic premise is very widely held.</p>
<p>If one takes that position, and McCain has given every reason to think that he does, it follows that one would routinely vote to confirm someone that you would not yourself have nominated. Thus, McCain&#8217;s statement only becomes a contradiction if one assumes an ancillary and disputed proposition: that a Senator should not vote to confirm someone they would not have nominated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lance</title>
		<link>http://www.theatlanticright.com/2008/08/18/mccain-not-in-cone-of-silence-during-first-half-hour-of-warren-forum/comment-page-1/#comment-64468</link>
		<dc:creator>Lance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 11:30:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://poligazette.com/2008/08/18/mccain-not-in-cone-of-silence-during-1st-half-of-warren-forum/#comment-64468</guid>
		<description>There were two things I noticed:

Why didn&#039;t McCain come out and say he was stuck in traffic instead of let everyone believe he was, &quot;In a Cone of Silence&quot; when Warren asked &quot;If the cone of Silence was comfortable? &quot; Mccain joked that he was trying to hear through the wall.  This would have been a good oportunity to explain what had happend. 

McCain answered so quickly that there was time for one more question that Obama did not answer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There were two things I noticed:</p>
<p>Why didn&#8217;t McCain come out and say he was stuck in traffic instead of let everyone believe he was, &quot;In a Cone of Silence&quot; when Warren asked &quot;If the cone of Silence was comfortable? &quot; Mccain joked that he was trying to hear through the wall.  This would have been a good oportunity to explain what had happend. </p>
<p>McCain answered so quickly that there was time for one more question that Obama did not answer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melanie</title>
		<link>http://www.theatlanticright.com/2008/08/18/mccain-not-in-cone-of-silence-during-first-half-hour-of-warren-forum/comment-page-1/#comment-64459</link>
		<dc:creator>Melanie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 09:52:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://poligazette.com/2008/08/18/mccain-not-in-cone-of-silence-during-1st-half-of-warren-forum/#comment-64459</guid>
		<description>I suggest everyone watch him and decide for themselves. Especially the way he worded it.  He asked directly about the &quot;Which Supreme Court Justice&quot; he wouldn&#039;t have chose. How did he know it was that question? He asked about it when the Roe. v. Wade question came up.

BTW, 3 of the Supreme&#039;s McSame named as ones he would NOT choose, he vote to confirm. LOL.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suggest everyone watch him and decide for themselves. Especially the way he worded it.  He asked directly about the &quot;Which Supreme Court Justice&quot; he wouldn&#8217;t have chose. How did he know it was that question? He asked about it when the Roe. v. Wade question came up.</p>
<p>BTW, 3 of the Supreme&#8217;s McSame named as ones he would NOT choose, he vote to confirm. LOL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Claudia, Assistant Editor</title>
		<link>http://www.theatlanticright.com/2008/08/18/mccain-not-in-cone-of-silence-during-first-half-hour-of-warren-forum/comment-page-1/#comment-64453</link>
		<dc:creator>Claudia, Assistant Editor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 08:28:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://poligazette.com/2008/08/18/mccain-not-in-cone-of-silence-during-1st-half-of-warren-forum/#comment-64453</guid>
		<description>Melanie, it was perfectly reasonable to assume that in that forum the SC was to be discussed. This, on its own, does not prove a previous knowledge of the questions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Melanie, it was perfectly reasonable to assume that in that forum the SC was to be discussed. This, on its own, does not prove a previous knowledge of the questions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melanie</title>
		<link>http://www.theatlanticright.com/2008/08/18/mccain-not-in-cone-of-silence-during-first-half-hour-of-warren-forum/comment-page-1/#comment-64451</link>
		<dc:creator>Melanie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 08:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://poligazette.com/2008/08/18/mccain-not-in-cone-of-silence-during-1st-half-of-warren-forum/#comment-64451</guid>
		<description>Watch it again, and pay close attention to McCain refer to the Supreme Court Justice question before it is asked.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Watch it again, and pay close attention to McCain refer to the Supreme Court Justice question before it is asked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dkawaii</title>
		<link>http://www.theatlanticright.com/2008/08/18/mccain-not-in-cone-of-silence-during-first-half-hour-of-warren-forum/comment-page-1/#comment-64450</link>
		<dc:creator>dkawaii</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 07:33:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://poligazette.com/2008/08/18/mccain-not-in-cone-of-silence-during-1st-half-of-warren-forum/#comment-64450</guid>
		<description>McCain a man of honor?  More like a serial liar.
A few lies off the top of my head:
&quot;I didn&#039;t say &#039;timeline&#039;&quot;
I never said that &quot;I wasn&#039;t an expert on the economy&quot;
I fought for the MLK Jr. Holiday.
&quot;I supported the Webb GI Bill&quot;
&quot;I received every award from every major veterans organization in America&quot;
“I’ve supported every investigation and ways of finding out what caused the Katrina tragedy.”

Come on.  The GOP knows that the stakes are too high.  They will lie and cheat every chance they get.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>McCain a man of honor?  More like a serial liar.<br />
A few lies off the top of my head:<br />
&quot;I didn&#8217;t say &#8216;timeline&#8217;&quot;<br />
I never said that &quot;I wasn&#8217;t an expert on the economy&quot;<br />
I fought for the MLK Jr. Holiday.<br />
&quot;I supported the Webb GI Bill&quot;<br />
&quot;I received every award from every major veterans organization in America&quot;<br />
“I’ve supported every investigation and ways of finding out what caused the Katrina tragedy.”</p>
<p>Come on.  The GOP knows that the stakes are too high.  They will lie and cheat every chance they get.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Claudia, Assistant Editor</title>
		<link>http://www.theatlanticright.com/2008/08/18/mccain-not-in-cone-of-silence-during-first-half-hour-of-warren-forum/comment-page-1/#comment-64449</link>
		<dc:creator>Claudia, Assistant Editor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 07:19:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://poligazette.com/2008/08/18/mccain-not-in-cone-of-silence-during-1st-half-of-warren-forum/#comment-64449</guid>
		<description>I think the forum was held on a false premise. The greatest attraction of the forum was that it was guaranteed to be fair because the questions would be identical and there would be no way for one candidate to base his answers on the other. This was eliminated through this incident. Now your view of the fairness of the forum depends solely on your personal opinion of the truthfulness of the McCain campaign. If you trust McCain, you believe him, and if you don&#039;t you do not. It lends reasonable doubt to the whole exercise. The McCain campaign has literally responded to doubts by saying that questioning the honesty of McCain, a former prisoner of war, is outrageous. Their use of his veteran status is so shameless it is nearly awe-inspiring. 

Personally, though I don&#039;t particularly trust nor distrust McCain, I would be inclined to doubt he listened in on Obama. I don&#039;t believe this because I am relying on his honor, but on his answers. McCain answered virtually every single question with standard stump speech talking points (with a few exceptions). He literally hijacked whole questions and never really directed himself towards Warren, but towards the viewing public. I believe he had planned to do this from the very beginning. His staff really did think that he wouldn&#039;t be able to listen in (I believe him being stuck in traffic was accidental) and so they prepared for the event by reviewing answers to a variety of issues and how to twist any question into either a reminder of his veteran status or a review of his policy talking points. This is a standard political practice and McCain treated this like a standard political event, not a conversation. I don&#039;t see very much in his answers that would have been different had he not heard Obama. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the forum was held on a false premise. The greatest attraction of the forum was that it was guaranteed to be fair because the questions would be identical and there would be no way for one candidate to base his answers on the other. This was eliminated through this incident. Now your view of the fairness of the forum depends solely on your personal opinion of the truthfulness of the McCain campaign. If you trust McCain, you believe him, and if you don&#8217;t you do not. It lends reasonable doubt to the whole exercise. The McCain campaign has literally responded to doubts by saying that questioning the honesty of McCain, a former prisoner of war, is outrageous. Their use of his veteran status is so shameless it is nearly awe-inspiring. </p>
<p>Personally, though I don&#8217;t particularly trust nor distrust McCain, I would be inclined to doubt he listened in on Obama. I don&#8217;t believe this because I am relying on his honor, but on his answers. McCain answered virtually every single question with standard stump speech talking points (with a few exceptions). He literally hijacked whole questions and never really directed himself towards Warren, but towards the viewing public. I believe he had planned to do this from the very beginning. His staff really did think that he wouldn&#8217;t be able to listen in (I believe him being stuck in traffic was accidental) and so they prepared for the event by reviewing answers to a variety of issues and how to twist any question into either a reminder of his veteran status or a review of his policy talking points. This is a standard political practice and McCain treated this like a standard political event, not a conversation. I don&#8217;t see very much in his answers that would have been different had he not heard Obama.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: More Lies</title>
		<link>http://www.theatlanticright.com/2008/08/18/mccain-not-in-cone-of-silence-during-first-half-hour-of-warren-forum/comment-page-1/#comment-64447</link>
		<dc:creator>More Lies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 06:50:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://poligazette.com/2008/08/18/mccain-not-in-cone-of-silence-during-1st-half-of-warren-forum/#comment-64447</guid>
		<description>Storeyy is right.  Man of honor?  He cheated on his first wife.  Participated in the Keating Five scandal.  Republicans have LIED for 8 straight years.  And you took it, and defended it.  We are tired of your lies.   This is suspect.  It stinks, stinks, stinks of something...

And btw, I don&#039;t say this because I thought McCain did a good job.  I don&#039;t.  I don&#039;t understand why people think this way.  McCain gave easy, stock answers that Evangelicals wanted to hear.  Here, the philanderer pretending to be a good Christian by saying b.s. like &quot;at the moment of conception&quot; and &quot;defeat (evil)&quot;  

Spare me.

Barack gave introspective, thoughtful, articulate, intelligent answers full of moral struggle and passion.  You can see his credibility in the Christain faith.  McCain came off as a lightweight who was stumping, not having a conversation in a &quot;civil forum.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Storeyy is right.  Man of honor?  He cheated on his first wife.  Participated in the Keating Five scandal.  Republicans have LIED for 8 straight years.  And you took it, and defended it.  We are tired of your lies.   This is suspect.  It stinks, stinks, stinks of something&#8230;</p>
<p>And btw, I don&#8217;t say this because I thought McCain did a good job.  I don&#8217;t.  I don&#8217;t understand why people think this way.  McCain gave easy, stock answers that Evangelicals wanted to hear.  Here, the philanderer pretending to be a good Christian by saying b.s. like &quot;at the moment of conception&quot; and &quot;defeat (evil)&quot;  </p>
<p>Spare me.</p>
<p>Barack gave introspective, thoughtful, articulate, intelligent answers full of moral struggle and passion.  You can see his credibility in the Christain faith.  McCain came off as a lightweight who was stumping, not having a conversation in a &quot;civil forum.&quot;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Wilson</title>
		<link>http://www.theatlanticright.com/2008/08/18/mccain-not-in-cone-of-silence-during-first-half-hour-of-warren-forum/comment-page-1/#comment-64446</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 06:50:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://poligazette.com/2008/08/18/mccain-not-in-cone-of-silence-during-1st-half-of-warren-forum/#comment-64446</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s a difference between a lie and misinformation. He was in a cone of silence at some point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a difference between a lie and misinformation. He was in a cone of silence at some point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: storeyy</title>
		<link>http://www.theatlanticright.com/2008/08/18/mccain-not-in-cone-of-silence-during-first-half-hour-of-warren-forum/comment-page-1/#comment-64444</link>
		<dc:creator>storeyy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 06:18:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://poligazette.com/2008/08/18/mccain-not-in-cone-of-silence-during-1st-half-of-warren-forum/#comment-64444</guid>
		<description>Rick Warren lied at the onset when he said John McCain was in the &quot;cone of silence&quot;.  He wold have had to know McCain wasn&#039;t there.  Everything after that is suspect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rick Warren lied at the onset when he said John McCain was in the &quot;cone of silence&quot;.  He wold have had to know McCain wasn&#8217;t there.  Everything after that is suspect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Wilson</title>
		<link>http://www.theatlanticright.com/2008/08/18/mccain-not-in-cone-of-silence-during-first-half-hour-of-warren-forum/comment-page-1/#comment-64440</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 05:47:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://poligazette.com/2008/08/18/mccain-not-in-cone-of-silence-during-1st-half-of-warren-forum/#comment-64440</guid>
		<description>McCain&#039;s positions were already clear, he never had doubts even before this forum, so to think that he cheated somehow and that&#039;s why he performed better is simply liberal bloggers trying to save-face after a defeat, especially because McCain went second, and especially because McCain performed well. If he had performed poorly, they wouldn&#039;t be making this argument.

And by the way, &lt;strong&gt;McCain did pause and think&lt;/strong&gt; quite a few times if you watch the video again, just not as much as slow Obama.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>McCain&#8217;s positions were already clear, he never had doubts even before this forum, so to think that he cheated somehow and that&#8217;s why he performed better is simply liberal bloggers trying to save-face after a defeat, especially because McCain went second, and especially because McCain performed well. If he had performed poorly, they wouldn&#8217;t be making this argument.</p>
<p>And by the way, <strong>McCain did pause and think</strong> quite a few times if you watch the video again, just not as much as slow Obama.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

