When Congressman Ron Paul was running for president (Libertarian Party) in 1988, he appeared on Morton Downey Jr.’s talk show. One of the people who were allowed to ask a question – a college student probably – asked Paul about the war on drugs. Paul responded angrily that the government can’t force people to become better people.
“Your solution on stopping drug trade is… give up,” the young questioner said. “Why give up” the war on drugs, he asked after that. Paul’s answer: “what we give up on is a tyrannical approach to a social medical problem.” He went on to explain that the government can’t force someone to become a better person. But that’s not where Paul stopped. The young man who asked the question was a tad bit chubby. Paul noticed and used it in his answer.
“The government… can’t make you follow good habits; why don’t they put you on a diet, you’re a little overweight, and I think you need a better health!” he said.
Watch it:
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=88REf0tjZHo[/youtube]
For what it’s worth: to quite a degree I can agree with Paul, or I can at least understand the way he thinks and sympathize with it.
That being said, there are some serious differences between being overweight and being a drug addict:
- Drugs completely ruin a life
- Drugs don’t just ruin the life of the addict, but also have a profound impact on his family, relatives and friends
- When many people in one neighborhood use drugs, the entire neighborhood is destroyed
- Food is generally healthy, even necessary. Drugs are not. Drugs are by their very nature wrong and destructive whereas food is only bad if you take in more than you need
- Those who sell food aren’t trying to become rich by destroying people’s lives. Those who sell drugs are
- Well, the list goes on and on
H/t Joe
/