2012 May 18 |
 |
http://www.theatlanticright.com/2007/10/21/i-dont-like-anarchists/
0
0
  |   74 comments

Friday evening, while protesting something they probably know very little about, a collection of white, middle-class college kids (also known as Anarchists apparently) marched through the upscale neighborhood of Georgetown here in Washington, DC. Protesting the corporatey corporations doing their corporatey stuff, these spoiled children began hurling bricks at storefront windows, in order to smash the state and such.

Unfortunately, they also managed to smash some poor young woman’s skull open (see pic above). All of this was apparently in preparation for Saturday’s big IMF/World Bank protests, or whatever. This is partly why I rarely go downtown these days. A pack of spoiled college freshmen ready for class war? I’ll pass.

Some of the organizers involved bragged today about shutting down shops in Georgetown, showing just how powerful they are and stuff. I think they started a drum circle and bought new Che T-shirts in order to celebrate, but that couldn’t be confirmed. The kiddies had this to say:

We are very pleased that many stores in the heart of Georgetown, long reviled by many longtime residents of the colony that is DC, including The GAP, American Eagle, Urban Outfitters, Banana Republic, and several cosmetics stores decided to close early Friday. Many of these stores rely on sweatshop labor, while at the same time denying their employees guaranteed rights, including the right to unionize and bargain collectively.

Georgetown has a long history, sadly not yet complete, of keeping out working class people of color. Once a separate city from Washington DC, Georgetown, at one point during the 19th century, was a haven of many recently freed slaves. However, much as low-income residents are now being pushed out of Washington, DC altogether through gentrification and the included increasing property values, poor people of color were also forced from Georgetown through “urban renewal”, even as early as the 1920′s.

And what a service they did today for DC’s working poor. By shutting down commerce in Georgetown today, on a Saturday, they deprived many of the city’s working poor a day’s wages. So while these kids all got on busses and went back to whatever college they’re from on mom and dad’s dime, actual DC residents got screwed. Yay Anarchism.

Where’s Eric Cartman when we need him?

  1. Posted by Xel
    | Quote | Trackback | Link #8015
    Xel "In short, there is no reason to assume that acknowledging the problems necessitates rejection of globalization as a concept. Conversely, supporting globalization does not require rejecting all discussion of problems with it." / Thread (as they say on imageboards.)
  2. Posted by Michael van der Galiën
    | Quote | Trackback | Link #8014
    Michael van der Galiën lol was that a threat? "I'll crush you like a cockroach" sounds more impressive.
  3. Posted by Xel
    | Quote | Trackback | Link #8012
    Xel Opinon bad! SMASH opinion!
  4. Posted by Kevin Sullivan
    | Quote | Trackback | Link #8011
    Kevin Sullivan 1. I think Hmmm just asked one of the other Anarchists to ban him. 2. Liver, Again, you have presented nothing. EVERY TIME you argue with your standard campus anti-globalilst you get the same rhetoric, and the same examples. The problem, as I stated with Jamaica, is that there are numerous reasons those countries can't sustain the level of trade they have placed upon them. Corruption. Weak legal structure. A weak state that can't enforce property rights. Then you propose the same damn docs that everyone here has probably seen, and cite that as your "hard facts." Telling me to go to the video store is not an argument! The problem with people like you is that you suffer from a severe case of majoritarianism. You don't respect the position you hold in the world of ideological debate--a very, very marginal one. Think of it this way...just about every room you walk into, every discussion you engage in, you will get push back on your ideas. Now, this doesn't make you wrong (you just also happen to be wrong). But being smug, and whining when people don't buy into your style of debate will get you know where.
  5. Posted by Hmmmm
    | Quote | Trackback | Link #8009
    Hmmmm "There is no point in attempting to engage you folks in honest and civil discussion. Maybe a brick to the head would suffice after all." This person nailed it. Kevin etc. Have a nice time stereotyping people and misrepresenting ideas. I'm sure all the really intelligent readers of this site will embrace your incredibly logical arguments. I'll work on being white and middle class so I can be a real anarchist.
  6. Posted by Kevin Sullivan
    | Quote | Trackback | Link #8010
    Kevin Sullivan Once again...boohoo, woah is me, I'm such a victim. We've given you numerous chances to make a serious argument, and you're complaining, linking us to FAQ pages like an insurance company and telling us to watch movies. Michael and I tolerated a guy threatening to kill us with his mom's hammer, the least you fools can do is tolerate some pushback to your marginal ideas, no?
  7. Posted by Tully
    | Quote | Trackback | Link #8007
    Tully you facist fuck Always with the oral sex after the spankings. ;-) Y'all anarchists realize how patellar-reflexively mindless you sound when you can't step outside your programmed dialectical cant and into a factual discussion using real evidence? Engage on reality rather than your pre-written political pomposity? Discuss issues rather than throw tantrums? One does note the immediate assignation of any disagreement with The Cause as being racist, fascist, etc. Spare me. I know, I know, it's because the white corporate power structure is oppressing the proles. Come and see the violence inherent in the system. (Why do anarchists all dress in black? To express their individuality!)
  8. Posted by Hmmmm
    | Quote | Trackback | Link #8008
    Hmmmm What can one discuss with someone who, faced with facts, continually replies "nuh uh!" What kind of intelligent discussion did you think this kind of blog posting would lead to? If you want to engage in civil discussion with people, try to summon a modicum of intelligence first. Dismissing hard facts ad nauseum does not encourage civil discussion. Ad hominem attacks on some contrived straw man "anarchist" you've invented do not encourage civil discussion. Do you really think anyone wants to discuss anything with a condescending prick who mis-characterizes them constantly? You act like people owe you some kind of respect. If all you're doing is spewing ignorance, don't expect a polite response.
  9. Posted by Kevin Sullivan
    | Quote | Trackback | Link #8077
    Kevin Sullivan I've given you numerous chances to present these hard facts. Where are they? What are they? You call people "fascist fucks," and expect civil conversation. Again, the fact that you can't even acknowledge just how small your circle is should be telling. For some reason, we're the ones who should engage you. Why? History has never been on your side, nor is the present day. You are a small, marginalized faction, and you should be BEGGING us to listen to you. Instead, you act smug, throw around words you don't even understand, and refer to ten year old documentaries as hard data. I don't want your respect, you're meaningless to me. I don't want respect from people who threaten other's lives, and rationalize assaulting an innocent woman. You owe a LOT of people respect, because the vast majority of the world will never hear your crying and your whining. The vast majority will never care. We've provided you audience here, and you've done nothing with it.
  10. Posted by Hmmmm
    | Quote | Trackback | Link #8076
    Hmmmm Thanks for the heads up on the way the world works. Here I was walking around basing my decisions on reality, and all along I should have been acting on insane delusions! Your pathetic rantings have completely altered my outlook on the world. Grow up and learn to read. I never expected any civil discussion with the likes of you. Your comments and your blog entries clearly display your ignorance and inability to use even basic logic. I just like egging you on. Carry on insulting the anarchist stereotype you seem so obsessed with.
  11. Posted by Tully
    | Quote | Trackback | Link #8075
    Tully If you want to engage in civil discussion with people, try to summon a modicum of intelligence first. We tried, but you showed up instead. Must be a glitch in the summoning spell. Got facts? Make argument. Reference facts. Be specific. Cite specific verifiable source for same. Rocket science, it's not.
  12. Posted by Michael van der Galiën
    | Quote | Trackback | Link #8070
    Michael van der Galiën "Hmmmmmm" shouldn't you, I don't know, throw bricks at young women by now?
  13. Posted by Kevin Sullivan
    | Quote | Trackback | Link #8071
    Kevin Sullivan You egged us on by coming to our blog and commenting, after I egged you on and hurt your feelings with my post. You should google search "egging on." You do it wrong. Seriously, Tully, we're wasting energy in typing on a 12 year old. This guy will be in a suit on Wall Street in ten years, so we might want to let the angsty angst run its course.
  14. Posted by Michael van der Galiën
    | Quote | Trackback | Link #8074
    Michael van der Galiën
    This guy will be in a suit on Wall Street in ten years, so we might want to let the angsty angst run its course.
    Ain't that the truth. And he and his buddies will talk about the good old days when they destroyed shops and injured innocent young women.
  15. Posted by Tully
    | Quote | Trackback | Link #8073
    Tully Wasting his energy more than mine--humor is good for the health. Haven't heard some of that silly stuff since the Sixties, and it was hilarious then. You could program the power-to-the-people dialogue into an ELIZA box and never be able to tell the difference. But I'll desist. We already know anarchists can't take over the world. They're too disorganized. ;-D
  16. Posted by Michael van der Galiën
    | Quote | Trackback | Link #8072
    Michael van der Galiën Kevin - although I respect you for admitting that you were one of them once - I've got say, don't use jargon please. "Egging on"? What's that all about. "Causing to act." Is that some kind of 'goal' for these people? Forcing people to act? And then what? We act by exposing them for their idiocy. But they're happy nonetheless because we at least 'acted?'
  17. Posted by Kevin Sullivan
    | Quote | Trackback | Link #8069
    Kevin Sullivan Sorry Michael, I was only using his lingo. Yes, cause to action or provocation would best describe that saying. I think junior has himself convinced that he riled us up. He isn't aware of really how easy it is to dispense with the likes of him.
  18. Posted by Kevin Sullivan
    | Quote | Trackback | Link #8068
  19. Posted by Tully
    | Quote | Trackback | Link #8066
    Tully USER: Good morning! ELIZA: This must be the case because no one else could possibly disagree with you. What a joke. Keep stroking your egos. You’ve exposed nothing but your extreme ignorance. USER: What did you have for breakfast today? ELIZA: You fascist ----! Your comments and your blog entries clearly display your ignorance and inability to use even basic logic. USER: I had spam and eggs for breakfast. ELIZA: Do you really think anyone wants to discuss anything with a condescending prick who mis-characterizes them constantly? You act like people owe you some kind of respect. If all you’re doing is spewing ignorance, don’t expect a polite response. Repeat, ad infinitum.
  20. Posted by Tully
    | Quote | Trackback | Link #8067
    Tully Sorry, Kevin, Michael. I coudn't resist. :-D
  21. Posted by PatHMV
    | Quote | Trackback | Link #8065
    PatHMV ROFL, Tully!!!!
  22. Posted by Ohhhhhh
    | Quote | Trackback | Link #8016
    Ohhhhhh http://wecouldbefamous.blogspot.com/ "Although she's making the best out of the situation by employing her sense of humor to get some laughs out of her minor celebrity, especially the videos of her stoic glare while covered in blood, Sayde would rather not have the attention. She thinks it's ridiculous that instead of discussing the issues behind the protest, instead the "debate" is reduced to outrage over the isolated violent incident. Rather than delve into the ethical quandaries posed by the often exploitative nature of IMF policies, we're given the damning evidence of an emerging threat that we all must fear and punish. As a responsible older brother, I'm especially angered that my sister's bloody face is all over the internet right now, exploited as justification for irrational and hateful opining about the intentions and evilness of a rather small group protesting American citizens."
  23. Posted by PatHMV
    | Quote | Trackback | Link #8013
    PatHMV Ohhhhhh, I'm certainly glad that your sister is not seriously injured, but I refuse to engage in a serious discussion over a policy issue like this as a result of violent, anarchistic protests. Have a calm, peaceful, non-violent protest which is not aimed at "shutting down" a city or an important meeting of global leaders, and I'll agree to serious discussion. But nobody should negotiate or debate issues as a result of attention gained by violence and disruption.
  24. Posted by Kevin Sullivan
    | Quote | Trackback | Link #8017
    Kevin Sullivan It's pretty simple, really... Girl gets hit, goes to hospital. idiot doesn't throw brick, girl not go to hospital.